Comments on: Vista Minimums Announced

By: vlad

vlad — Fri, 19 May 2006 15:42:55 +0000

Wha wha wha? I didn’t make nobody do nothing!

By: Geckzilla

Geckzilla — Fri, 19 May 2006 14:52:12 +0000

Aw, I tried to run their “Upgrade Advisor” on my computer and it said I had to use Windows XP to install it. x64 isn’t good enough! Why’d you make me install this crap, Vlad?

By: Lizzy33

Lizzy33 — Fri, 19 May 2006 12:55:39 +0000

I’m writing this message on an AMD Athlon 2000, 1 GB Ram, GeForce 5500/128mb ram running Vista and I can witness that Vista performs better than XP on this system.

It is not anything to write home about but its the latest and greatest so hey… I’ll try anything.

By: Mark Griers

Mark Griers — Fri, 19 May 2006 04:50:56 +0000

I have to admit that I did bite the eyecandy fluff. It is gorgeous, I will get it the day it comes out.

My clients on the other hand, no way. There is simply nothing businessworthy in Vista. Sorry. The “security” what I have seen of it is more of a nuisance and I’m sure it will get just as many security exploits as XP will. I will advise skipping the Vista release cycle.

By: nizami

nizami — Fri, 19 May 2006 02:03:30 +0000

I am a registered guest of MS TECH ED 2006 but will not be able to attend.
Anyone interested in the Ticket as a substitute attendee?
nizami.2@juno.com

By: Carrie Bush

Carrie Bush — Fri, 19 May 2006 01:14:37 +0000

It’s taken how long for them to build a Mac?

By: mstiller

mstiller — Thu, 18 May 2006 18:19:12 +0000

Vlad, Vlad, Vlad…

When was the last time you were able to do ANYTHING on a system with minimum specs? This pig won’t sing with at least 2GB in it and you know it, meanwhile even most laptops have max 2GB even today.

They need to scrap Vista and go back to the optimization school.