<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Outlook for you! Exchange 2007 Licensing Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html</link>
	<description>Vlad Mazek on IT, Business and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jibin</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-39005</link>
		<dc:creator>Jibin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html#comment-39005</guid>
		<description>Hello Sir,
wish to know if we don&#039;t purchase full office package which includes(microsoft outlook,word,excel,powerpoint,access). Just we want to reduce the cost so We will just be requiring microsoft outlook 2007 only .Can this only package be bought in order to reduce the cost. Currently our exchange server is 2003.
Need your Guidance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Sir,<br />
wish to know if we don&#8217;t purchase full office package which includes(microsoft outlook,word,excel,powerpoint,access). Just we want to reduce the cost so We will just be requiring microsoft outlook 2007 only .Can this only package be bought in order to reduce the cost. Currently our exchange server is 2003.<br />
Need your Guidance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: download free polyphonic ringtones nokia india</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-25144</link>
		<dc:creator>download free polyphonic ringtones nokia india</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html#comment-25144</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;download free polyphonic ringtones nokia india...&lt;/strong&gt;

download free polyphonic ringtones nokia india...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>download free polyphonic ringtones nokia india&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>download free polyphonic ringtones nokia india&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Read the Exchange 2007 fine print &#124; All about Microsoft &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-20859</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Read the Exchange 2007 fine print &#124; All about Microsoft &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html#comment-20859</guid>
		<description>[...] game? Microsoft gets more Software Assurance subscribers but opens the door wide open for Open Office. Now if they were just smart enough to create a web-only desktop and integrate OWA with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] game? Microsoft gets more Software Assurance subscribers but opens the door wide open for Open Office. Now if they were just smart enough to create a web-only desktop and integrate OWA with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielp : Another poor decision from Microsoft - Exchange 2007 CAL does not include Oulook 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-18799</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielp : Another poor decision from Microsoft - Exchange 2007 CAL does not include Oulook 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html#comment-18799</guid>
		<description>[...] Vlad Mazek - Vladville Blog Â» Blog Archive Â» No Outlook for you! Exchange 2007 Licensing Change: http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html  Posted: Saturday, December 30, 2006 1:17 AM by Danielp [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vlad Mazek &#8211; Vladville Blog Â» Blog Archive Â» No Outlook for you! Exchange 2007 Licensing Change: <a href="http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html</a>  Posted: Saturday, December 30, 2006 1:17 AM by Danielp [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandyS</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-18550</link>
		<dc:creator>RandyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html#comment-18550</guid>
		<description>Everybody uses email, but not everybody uses Office. Not once in my 10 years working with SBS have I had a client say that they felt cheated because whatever Office version they had purchased had Outlook, so they already had a copy. 
You cannot fully utilize Exchange 2007 without Outlook 2007 IMHO. I see it as an integral part of Exchange. If everyone purchasing Exchange (especially SBSers) is expected to have to throw down an additional $75-$100 for Outlook, I think that MS is delusional. On the other hand, if Outlook is so valuable that it needs to be seperated from Exchange, then we should expect to see a significant reduction in the Exchange User CAL price, shouldn&#039;t we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody uses email, but not everybody uses Office. Not once in my 10 years working with SBS have I had a client say that they felt cheated because whatever Office version they had purchased had Outlook, so they already had a copy.<br />
You cannot fully utilize Exchange 2007 without Outlook 2007 IMHO. I see it as an integral part of Exchange. If everyone purchasing Exchange (especially SBSers) is expected to have to throw down an additional $75-$100 for Outlook, I think that MS is delusional. On the other hand, if Outlook is so valuable that it needs to be seperated from Exchange, then we should expect to see a significant reduction in the Exchange User CAL price, shouldn&#8217;t we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva" : Be careful what you ask for...</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-18546</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva" : Be careful what you ask for...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html#comment-18546</guid>
		<description>[...] what you ask for... you just might get it... Share this post: email it! &#124; bookmark it! &#124; digg it! &#124; live it!  Published Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:23 PM by bradley Filed under:News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what you ask for&#8230; you just might get it&#8230; Share this post: email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | live it!  Published Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:23 PM by bradley Filed under:News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morganman24</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-18544</link>
		<dc:creator>morganman24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html#comment-18544</guid>
		<description>I think they did this, because most people buy Microsoft Office anyway and don&#039;t use the copy of Outlook with Exchange. Hence why Exchange 2007 doesn&#039;t come with Outlook 07.  
They thought it was a good idea, guess we will see. 
But I&#039;m talking from the point of small biz computing and not big biz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they did this, because most people buy Microsoft Office anyway and don&#8217;t use the copy of Outlook with Exchange. Hence why Exchange 2007 doesn&#8217;t come with Outlook 07.<br />
They thought it was a good idea, guess we will see.<br />
But I&#8217;m talking from the point of small biz computing and not big biz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimBarrett</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-18542</link>
		<dc:creator>TimBarrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2006/12/no-outlook-for-you-exchange-2007-licensing-change.html#comment-18542</guid>
		<description>Licensing... the other white meat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Licensing&#8230; the other white meat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

