<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion on SBS 2008, Essential Business Server and SMB computing in 2008 and beyond..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html</link>
	<description>Vlad Mazek on IT, Business and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The not-so-official Microsoft Australia SBS blog : It won't be long now as Microsoft announces Small Business Server 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html/comment-page-1#comment-29522</link>
		<dc:creator>The not-so-official Microsoft Australia SBS blog : It won't be long now as Microsoft announces Small Business Server 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html#comment-29522</guid>
		<description>[...] How will this fit in with the burgeoning world of hosted services? Even though I don&#039;t necessarily agree with every point, Vlad has an interesting take on this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How will this fit in with the burgeoning world of hosted services? Even though I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with every point, Vlad has an interesting take on this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html/comment-page-1#comment-29491</link>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html#comment-29491</guid>
		<description>David,

I really and truly don&#039;t agree with that. I think the answer is coming from someone far bigger than me in this space and frankly I think it will again come down to the issue of cost, not in the eyes of a frugal business owner, but in the advertised price of a similar replacement.

We had a discussion over the weekend that started with &quot;people are complaining that SBS will now need two servers&quot; and I asked &quot;is that complaint only valid because you guys sells disproportionately overpriced hardware to mark up your consulting costs&quot; which ended in &quot;business owners realize the need for the cost of good hardware and cost of downtime is higher than the cost of hardware.&quot;

So here is where we are heading, at least according to me. Reliable wireless bandwidth is here. I happen to be on it right now, its twice as fast and 1/6 the cost of the fixed line / T1. Many places are now getting fiber, etc. Most workers are starting to go remote - working from home, from conference, from hotel, from road, from the office down the street. Meanwhile, energy costs are going through the roof and Microsoft licensing isn&#039;t coming down either.

The cost of infrastructure is going through the roof while the cost of having it hosted is trending towards $0.  

I don&#039;t think SBS / EBS stands a chance. I also don&#039;t think the Active Directory and Microsoft desktop management are going to be viable in the future because we don&#039;t have pretty little offices with PoE running around, a server room, two geeks to keep it alive, etc... when it can be purchased alacarte, on demand, scalable and affordable.

The marketplace changed. Yes, there will always be opportunities in the infrastructure design for people that need it, but it will be coming at a much higher premium because the talent required to manage that complexity will far outpace the savings from the consolidation. Remember, even though SBS 2008 is dead easy to manage, you aren&#039;t exactly going to click on two buttons to go from SBS 2003 to 2008 - or 2012 or whatever is next. 

There will be infrastructure opportunities, but they will be diminishing. My company will focus on catering to the growing demand for the reliable and scalable cloud stuff and my differentiator is that unlike Google and Microsoft, I offer SLA and support. The old cost of downtime in infrastructure is being replaced by the cost of support line wait time with India - and thats why you pay more to deal with me.

To be honest, it has been paying off far better than infrastructure, 2 years running.

-Vlad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I really and truly don&#8217;t agree with that. I think the answer is coming from someone far bigger than me in this space and frankly I think it will again come down to the issue of cost, not in the eyes of a frugal business owner, but in the advertised price of a similar replacement.</p>
<p>We had a discussion over the weekend that started with &#8220;people are complaining that SBS will now need two servers&#8221; and I asked &#8220;is that complaint only valid because you guys sells disproportionately overpriced hardware to mark up your consulting costs&#8221; which ended in &#8220;business owners realize the need for the cost of good hardware and cost of downtime is higher than the cost of hardware.&#8221;</p>
<p>So here is where we are heading, at least according to me. Reliable wireless bandwidth is here. I happen to be on it right now, its twice as fast and 1/6 the cost of the fixed line / T1. Many places are now getting fiber, etc. Most workers are starting to go remote &#8211; working from home, from conference, from hotel, from road, from the office down the street. Meanwhile, energy costs are going through the roof and Microsoft licensing isn&#8217;t coming down either.</p>
<p>The cost of infrastructure is going through the roof while the cost of having it hosted is trending towards $0.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think SBS / EBS stands a chance. I also don&#8217;t think the Active Directory and Microsoft desktop management are going to be viable in the future because we don&#8217;t have pretty little offices with PoE running around, a server room, two geeks to keep it alive, etc&#8230; when it can be purchased alacarte, on demand, scalable and affordable.</p>
<p>The marketplace changed. Yes, there will always be opportunities in the infrastructure design for people that need it, but it will be coming at a much higher premium because the talent required to manage that complexity will far outpace the savings from the consolidation. Remember, even though SBS 2008 is dead easy to manage, you aren&#8217;t exactly going to click on two buttons to go from SBS 2003 to 2008 &#8211; or 2012 or whatever is next. </p>
<p>There will be infrastructure opportunities, but they will be diminishing. My company will focus on catering to the growing demand for the reliable and scalable cloud stuff and my differentiator is that unlike Google and Microsoft, I offer SLA and support. The old cost of downtime in infrastructure is being replaced by the cost of support line wait time with India &#8211; and thats why you pay more to deal with me.</p>
<p>To be honest, it has been paying off far better than infrastructure, 2 years running.</p>
<p>-Vlad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackie</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html/comment-page-1#comment-29481</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html#comment-29481</guid>
		<description>No I mean generally the concept of in house fully hosted Infrastructure. I think you are on the right track with &quot;Cloud Services&quot; in country and I have widely said one of the reasons we are such big fans.

So all Infrastructure products are not such as well WEBS 2008 will continue strongly is some markets.

Didn&#039;t mean that in the cloud providers can&#039;t be flexible to take some of the market where &quot;Security and Trust&quot; are manadated but not many are as agile as OWN / Exchange Defender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I mean generally the concept of in house fully hosted Infrastructure. I think you are on the right track with &#8220;Cloud Services&#8221; in country and I have widely said one of the reasons we are such big fans.</p>
<p>So all Infrastructure products are not such as well WEBS 2008 will continue strongly is some markets.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t mean that in the cloud providers can&#8217;t be flexible to take some of the market where &#8220;Security and Trust&#8221; are manadated but not many are as agile as OWN / Exchange Defender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html/comment-page-1#comment-29454</link>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html#comment-29454</guid>
		<description>David,

As I&#039;ve mentioned, we&#039;re addressing this by putting our servers outside USA to comply with local laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve mentioned, we&#8217;re addressing this by putting our servers outside USA to comply with local laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackie</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html/comment-page-1#comment-29450</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html#comment-29450</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t mean hole as in flaw, more that there is scope based on industry to allow the traditional model unexpected longevity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t mean hole as in flaw, more that there is scope based on industry to allow the traditional model unexpected longevity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D. Alligood</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html/comment-page-1#comment-29449</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D. Alligood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html#comment-29449</guid>
		<description>Vlad Mazak: The Lando Calrissian of SMB.

For those non-Star Wars fans; which by the way, you will go to Hell for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lando_Calrissian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad Mazak: The Lando Calrissian of SMB.</p>
<p>For those non-Star Wars fans; which by the way, you will go to Hell for: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lando_Calrissian" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lando_Calrissian</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackie</title>
		<link>http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html/comment-page-1#comment-29448</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vladville.com/2008/02/opinion-on-sbs-2008-essential-business-server-and-smb-computing-in-2008-and-beyond.html#comment-29448</guid>
		<description>The only hole in this thinking is that &quot;The Cloud&quot; needs to be perochial due to the Globalised distrust of things not held in same country or political coalition. So while I completely agree that infrastructure only companies will struggle in most markets there are some that will continue strongly from a manadate to secure customer data IAW the customers wishes, which will mean excluding the cloud, at least in the medium term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only hole in this thinking is that &#8220;The Cloud&#8221; needs to be perochial due to the Globalised distrust of things not held in same country or political coalition. So while I completely agree that infrastructure only companies will struggle in most markets there are some that will continue strongly from a manadate to secure customer data IAW the customers wishes, which will mean excluding the cloud, at least in the medium term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

