Vladville: The Final Post

Gadgets, IT Business, IT Culture
1 Comment

Since early 2003, this blog (and it’s blogger.com predecessor) chronicled the Fast Times at SMB high, the rise and fall of several business models and the lessons learned along the way to building wealth and solutions for the SMB technology marketplace. From the network engineer to SPF to IT Consultant to VAR to MSP to Master MSP era’s, it’s been a fun ride and it’s also been 10 years since I’ve had a real vacation (instead of 2-3 days here and there).. so.. as both I and my company move on to the next chapter in our lives, I figured it would be fitting to sum up the last 10 years of SMB IT and explain how and why things are changing.

The Cloud Prior to 2002

From roughly 1997-2003, the SMB world was preoccupied with simply establishing a presence. From the massive buildout of LANs across small businesses to building web pages, this was the era during which people figured there was a world beyond @aol.com or @compuserve.com. Microsoft was taking over the network dominance from Novell and for the most part the IT businesses of this time were high on skill and highly compensated for it.

My first job in 1996 involved me talking to SMBs and helping them write connection scripts for Trumpet Winsock. With the release of Windows 95 the obstacle of connecting to the Internet was nearly eliminated and it created the largest surge of small business users trying to get to it. Along with it came the IT Consultant who no longer had to have a tremendous amount of networking skill – just listen to the customer and know who to call for help.

This was also the moment at which technology became affordable and available. Purchasing computers immediately prior to this era required setting aside thousands of dollars to place the order, waiting weeks if not months for your 486 or that shiny new Pentium, upgrading your modem or USR Courier firmware every fall – naturally, you wanted to consult more than the sales guy when parting with so much money or reading books (yes, books – thick ones with no pictures) to get up and running. Prior to this it wasn’t simply enough to want something and have money to buy it – you had all sorts of considerations and limitations in place. People had to find out if they were on copper or SLIC lines, they learned their distance from the central office or DMARC. 

This era ended with the ability to walk into Best Buy and walk out with everything you needed 20 minutes later.

With this mass availability of technology the biggest business for SMB consultants was connecting all these computers, printers and “the Internet.”

Primary business: LAN buildouts. Most of us made money on the side designing web sites, setting up an online presence, upgrading networks to Windows 95, NT4 and dreaming about XP.

SMB, The Cloud and 2003

This was the year that everything changed. Windows XP had taken off, Microsoft announced Office 2003 and SBS 2003.

For the first time, ever, it was the user that was put in charge. SBS 2003 was in fact designed to allow the business owner to manage things, not the IT department.

There was a catch here. Because things got so easy for people that were computer savvy, suddenly if you were in business but not on the Internet you were at a huge disadvantage.

Computers got cheap. Internet access got even cheaper. The demand for all things IT skyrocketed. We got mobile.

It also marked a gold rush of SMB IT jobs. Prior to this, most SMBs didn’t have an IT department, the closest they got to one was having one of the employees kids come after school to fix computer problems. But troubleshooting network connectivity wasn’t as easy as changing the screen resolution or creating desktop shortcuts. Enter the “IT Consultant”

This was also an era in which being an SMB IT Consultant went from a highly profitable hobby to an actual professional that had to talk about more than just technology. Because the job of connecting everyone and everything became more time consuming, it also became extremely expensive: justifying costs, explaining the tradeoffs, presenting alternatives and being a part of planning stages was the new norm.

It also shifted many of the existing companies from being technology enthusiasts to focusing on the business. The rise of VAR came from the rapidly declining costs of hardware, software and directly from the decrease in complexity. Because the costs started shifting from the cost of purchase to the cost of deployment and support, established SMB IT companies started reselling a lot more than just their time or their one vendor they were certified/authorized for.

Primary business: Network infrastructure. Beyond computers and monitors, IT in small business became less of a tool and more a part of the process. Margins on hardware declined but margins on support and billable hours exploded.

2004-2005 The Dawn of Cloud

Now even laptops were affordable. Internet was everywhere and it was free. It started showing up at Starbucks and McDonalds. Email became free and Google’s Gmail launched with 1GB of storage.

SMB IT started to mature and the support personnel that came with it was under more fire to respond quickly to problems and outages. Businesses started relying on technology more and demanded it on mobile devices. At home. On the road.

Assuring the uptime and eliminating ugly encounters with large service bills gave rise to managed services model. VARs could now get a more predictable level of revenue and eliminate the surprises that came with ad-hoc support.

The key here was that network control became decentralized: you no longer had to be in the office to work and the IT provider no longer had to stop by to fix the problems or perform maintenance tasks.

Primary business: VAR. The more dependent companies became on technology, the more stuff they bought and wanted it connected and sync’d to their existing infrastructure.

2005 – 2008 The Fall of Steel

As the small IT solution providers were building their management cloud, they were simultaneously discounting the relevance and eventual success of large software companies who no longer wanted middlemen at the gate. The entire SMB IT food chain turned from steel and towards services.

IT providers faced their second major growth challenge in a decade: maintaining technical expertise while supporting/migrating/project planning of legacy systems.

For the first time we no longer were preoccupied with the faster, newer processor or the next big OS – we were spending more time trying to keep the old stuff up.

It was also the beginning of the end. With software/hardware companies at odds with the clients and partners that dealt with the client issues, someone had to fix the problem.

Primary business: Support.

2008 The Fall of Bear Sterns & Global Depression. The rise of IT consumerism.

To this day, the most popular Vladville post is the one covering the fall of Bear Sterns that plunged us into a depression/recession. Almost immediately following March 16, 2008 folks stopped looking forward with technology as an investment and focused on it’s cost.

This was bad news for pretty much everyone. Large companies gutted their IT departments. Small companies froze projects, purchases and more.

This was the era of “Do we really need ___?”

This was the tipping point for the cloud in SMB. Up to this point, the sales were largely based on the solution fit and the new features that solved problems. The discussion went from buying something new and towards using something less expensive.

At the same time, technology became more personal and the division between work PC and home PC blurred with the new wave of smartphones, web sites and online services. The more cool stuff people used, the more of it ended up in the business.

Suddenly workers were not willing to wait for the IT department to get things online or to allow something that restricted their control – they just signed up for an online service and eliminated the middleman. In SMB, we were the middleman.

Primary business: Support.

2008 – 2011: Cloud, Cloud, Cloud

The title sums it up. IT providers, to both large and small companies, were dealing less with steel and cables and more with consumer devices, online services, hosted services and gadgets.

The era of buying something that would break and then cost you to fix it was replaced with the subscription service that (once it broke) could be substituted with another. When it was no longer needed it got handed down (iPod, iPad, iPhone) or repurposed.

Primary business: Pimpin’ – anything that could be marked up, measured or required IT assistance got a plan attached to it.

The Future

The future, or the end of the past I’ve outlined so far, is surprisingly similar.

The frustration of IT Solution Providers over not being able to move ahead quickly is met with the rapidly declining demand for their services. The consumers (not clients anymore) are willing to pay for certain services but that doesn’t make IT Solution Providers profitable or produce a reliable revenue stream. User friendly gadgets and user friendly online services seamlessly integrate with one another and with social networking and Google, solving problems is easier than ever.

The error margin is widening and tolerance for failure is higher as we have alternatives. If the computer is dead, you pick up your tablet. If it’s dead, you go to your smartphone. If you don’t have reception, you’re never too far from free wifi. Service companies get by without even posting a phone number on their web sites and support is peer based through social networking sites and forums. The value of the human interaction, while desirable, is not compensated enough for it to exist.

This is a far cry from a highly competent, highly skilled and full service IT solution provider. They are deemed too expensive. Meanwhile, a large cloud service provider loses tens of thousands of accounts and escapes without a scratch.

Let me make this clear: This is the end of IT Service Provider business as we’ve known it.

Without being able to pick the low hanging fruit (remote managed services) IT Solution Providers will find a harder time trying to pay off the huge investment in the tools and training they bought to build the business up in the first place. It’s not like all the servers and IT demands are suddenly going to disappear and be replaced by the iPad or the next Android tablet, but with the consumers ability to find quick and cheap alternatives the profitability and business viability of your typical IT Solution Provider is questionable.

That is a difficult thought to swallow but as you can read in this post, it is not the first time our industry and our profession has faced a challenge. What is new is that at some point the paths of software/hardware manufacturers and those that support their solutions diverged. The software/hardware manufacturers won – they are selling more stuff than ever but the support jobs that existed to get that technology in the hands of consumers aren’t needed. They made devices cheaper, software more reliable, user experience more friendly and the consultant unnecessary.

Everything has become a subscription service. There will still be edge cases, a slim minority that will either never be able to accept that or use it. But business is seldom about edge cases and IT services aren’t luxury goods.

It is time to take a good hard look at what makes money and what doesn’t, what sells and what doesn’t, and what the marketplace is actually demanding. In my career I’ve been blessed enough to build and sell computers with a $1,000 margin, collect thousands of dollars for a migration that took half a day, get thousands of dollars just for offering my opinion on a conference call and get paid for seeing the progress bar move from left to right.

Those days are gone. So is Vladville’s coverage and fascination with it. I have a month-long vacation coming up to reflect on the past decade of the fun in this business and look forward to coming back and talking about what’s next. In the meantime, I encourage you to sign up for our Own Web Now blog and Looks Cloudy site.

Final Ironman Update & Entrepreneurial Frustration

Boss, GTD, IT Business
Comments Off on Final Ironman Update & Entrepreneurial Frustration

The 90-day no-break work schedule comes to an end in a week. If you don’t know me, feel free to scroll down to the bold part.

I’m taking nearly a month-long vacation as a result of it and will surface back at the Kaseya conference in Las Vegas. I still have way too much to do in the remaining week of the Ironman schedule but two final giant pieces of the agenda are slowly falling in place. I’m fairly confident they will come through but I’m not really willing to kill myself into the finish line.

I guess the most important thing I’ve learned (and this is personal for me, your mileage may vary) is that quitting prolongs work. Without a Saturday and Sunday to look forward to my work towards the end result simply continued and there was no artificial calendar pressure for me to get things done by the certain day or time: “I’ll look at it tonight”

The other thing I learned is that this Ironman process is simply brute-force work of getting stuff done. Everything that has been completed in Q1 was a direct result of planning last Q4 and builds on more than a year of intense road schedule talking to partners face to face. I didn’t have to stop to be creative, wait for the input, etc. It’s all been about seeing it through, making adjustments, focusing on the mission at hand.

Finally, I learned how little I need to be involved in most of what the company does. Which brings me to the topic of the day.

walt-disney_zoetrope-1940s 

“It is good to have a failure while you are young because it teaches you so much.”

– Walt Disney

Entrepreneurial Frustration

Every (successful) technology company owner I know struggles with the frustration of managing stuff we don’t want to be dealing with: payroll, HR, legal, finance, client disputes, local government, landlord, vendors, etc.

Most of it happens to be extremely emotionally draining.

Not every once in a while but nearly all the damn time.

If the best thing that happened to you in a day is your cell phone battery dying so you can have a moment to think about something other than the pile of crap you can’t believe you have to deal with in order to build a company and contribute to your community, you haven’t worked as a CEO.

Welcome, you’re among friends.

Everyone that reaches any reasonable level of success gets to the stuff above. For the more ambitious dumber ones among us that have read e-myth or unfortunately lived it, the fascination with perfection and fear of failure further entangles every part of us into the company.

It’s not that you don’t realize that you aren’t delegating enough, it’s that you’ve put so much to bring your business to this level that you know that just one more thing will push you towards perfection.

This is why “balance” is bull

So you go in to work day in and day out and the pile of stuff that you’ve entangled yourself in climbs every day. Eventually the stress peaks and manifests itself in an ugly way and you give up decide to strike some balance.

029206_18

“I’m going to start taking time off”. Outcome: Because you’re still a part of everything, your time off is filled thinking about all the stuff that could be going wrong at this very minute. Even worse, when you get back from your time off the problems seem to have procreated new, more annoying problems.

“I’m going to delegate, outsource.” Outcome: Whoever you delegate/outsource your problems to is far less equipped to deal with them because only you happen to know where the bodies are buried and you’re horrified every time they unearth one and fail in the same ways that drove you to giving them away.

“I’m going to start drinking more.” Outcome: Bliss. Happiness. Occasional hilarious videos of you singing along to Darkness “I believe in a thing called love” while using your two year old son as an air guitar.

Lesson here: The more you try to balance dealing with problems and not dealing with problems, the bigger your problems will get.

To Sum It Up

You don’t build a successful company without failing. A lot.

There is no ignoring, delegating or moving past the problems you’ve caused. You’re not too big to fail and nobody is going to bail you out, fire you with a golden parachute or clean up after you. By ignoring this (through the “finding balance in my life” excuses) or exaggerating it (“I’m just going to work harder, be more involved in everything) – at least in my experienceyou aren’t dealing with the problem you’re dancing around it.

I personally danced around many problems I’ve caused my business (a discussion for a different time) for a better part of a decade and it took a very long time for me to prepare the people I work with to be able to help me fix the problems and hand over those responsibilities and document the processes so that we can finally move forward.

Ironman process forced me to stare down my problems day in and day out without daydreaming of not having to deal with them momentarily for a day or two. It involved me (“coming to Jesus”, pardon the expression if you’re religious) identifying the problems and working my way out of it.

My point is that everyone makes mistakes and they are just a part of life. As long as you’re lucky enough to open your eyes the next day, you can work towards correcting the mistakes, fixing the problems and seeing your dreams and vision becoming reality.

My lesson learned here is that I worked so hard for so long to get to where I’m at: what’s a little more extra effort to fix the things I messed up along the way? Go and do likewise, gents.

Strength or Weakness

Boss
Comments Off on Strength or Weakness

As you’ve read here for the past few years, we’ve been on a huge growth curve. Due to rather inadequate training and onboarding processes this meant a lot of interviews and lot’s of people to judge very quickly. But enough about the process, this one is personal.

One of the boilerplate questions we have to ask is “What would you say is your greatest weakness?” or “What was your biggest challenge and how did you overcome it?”

First: You’d be shocked how stupid most people are: they answer it outright in a way that explains precisely why they are out looking for a job.

Second: It shows you that they have no idea how stupid they are. Listen, there is no such thing as a perfect employee and you’re not the first person I’ve ever interviewed. So if your weakness is “I’m too nice to customers” or “I work too hard” just go back to the used car dealership.

But like I said, this one is personal and this week someone asked me what my answer would be. Of course it depends on the role I was going for but if I had to answer honestly it’s typically that I bite off a lot more than I can chew. Now before you queue a fatass buffet joke about me, I mean that in terms of ambition. I often take on stuff that I’m either not capable of or am not sure how I’ll pull off in the first place.

It’s negative in a sense that I typically put in far too much work to get something done and grossly misjudge the amount of time needed to get something done. I’m pretty sure every developer (at least every developer I’ve ever worked with) deals with this issue, when you get down to the details creativity is the enemy of productivity.

It’s positive in a sense that I probably never would have made more than $50,000 if I only stuck to what I was good at. By constantly challenging myself I was able to build my company into something quite impressive.

Now, how does this impact my ability to get a job? Well, in an environment where I was left to make my own decisions, I probably wouldn’t fit. Nobody wants to hire a workhorse and work him to death because you’re back to hiring someone to clean that persons mess (and everyone leaves one). On the other hand, in a managed environment where creativity would be curbed by a decision maker and execution driven by someone that can actually do stuff, stuff happens.

ExchangeDefender 7

ExchangeDefender
Comments Off on ExchangeDefender 7

About an hour ago I wrapped up my ExchangeDefender preview of everything we’re doing with the “7” release. In a lot ways this is a huge change.

First of all, this is the first release ever to not have a single line of code written by me. I think it’s very fitting because the world that ExchangeDefender was written for and that I designed it around no longer exists – IT solutions providers are building sites and services, not LANs and servers.

Second, it’s a huge change of business for Own Web Now. Namely, it’s no more. We will soon be rebranding and all our solutions from Shockey Monkey to Offsite Backups, will be known under one brand – ExchangeDefender. We are changing our model from a company that provides the building blocks to MSPs into one that delivers the entire service – through MSPs under their brand. The complexities behind these products are getting to be so broad that anyone that doesn’t specialize in messaging will soon be at a major disadvantage: we hope to provide that specialty to our providers while still providing them with the tools if they want to build something custom.

The changes – of ExchangeDefender core and apps – will significantly improve our partners margins, provide more functionality in our products and hopefully make the entire ExchangeDefender chain a lot more profitable. We’re not going at this alone, lot’s of our friends are playing a huge part in it all, and I for one look forward to it.

To everyone that got us to this point – thank you. Being able to deliver this today is the best day I’ve had in this company.

Who should I feel sorry for?

IT Business
Comments Off on Who should I feel sorry for?

Earlier today, over lunch featuring wings, cold beer and a prank game of who can eat the most mango habanero sauce, we got into the discussion over the NFL’s current labor dispute and how it impacts our ability to sell stuff.

For those of you outside of United States, the NFL is the national football league. It’s not real football as experienced in the rest of the world… it’s uneducated jocks running at each other as hard as possible and when not causing a near fatal injury they just so happen to stumble onto an operation that generates over $9 billion dollars a year. The owners of these football teams are upset at the amount of money they are spending on player salaries so a few years ago they decided to negotiate TV contracts that would end up paying them if the football games were played or not. The players (NFL Players Association) is a union of extremely talented players that bargained collectively for an agreement that basically said after the certain amount of money had been spent on operational expenses (stadiums, etc) the revenue between the players and the football club owners would be split. Last year the NFL owners said they needed $1 billion dollars in extra cash to run the operations – while not completely disclosing what that cash was going to – and effectively taking it out of players pockets. Negotiations ensued, and failed, with owners locking out the players from the stadiums. Multimillionaires on both sides, who should you feel sorry for?

Those are the facts.

Before you go for the easy answers: NFL owners cannot replace players with non-NFL players (see: College Basketball) because nobody wants to watch non-professionals.

This makes the case for IT Solution Providers.

When you go into a negotiation over pricing and the decision maker who pays his employees $10/hr cannot completely comprehend why you’re worth 10 times that salary will be in a similar position that the NFL owners and the NFL players are currently in: greed. The owners (decision makers) want to keep as much of their money as possible but they face the ugly fact of trying to make due with the cheap crap.

Your job in any sales position is to make sure the decision owners considers the cost of halfassing (yes, it’s a word: h?f??st?, häf?äst: adjective, vulgar slang: 1. not well planned 2. incompetent) their IT solutions and achieving the same level of operational inefficiency they hate today.

In simpler terms: Every business owner believes he is overpaying his people because he sees the mistakes they make on the daily basis. Hiring a professional would (effectively) be cheaper than adding a +1 to the employee roster.

Nobody likes scabs. Be a pro.

Time

GTD
Comments Off on Time

It’s amazing how much can be accomplished just by quick little fixes, quick videos, quick braindump in a document or training tips. If only even an hour a day went towards addressing operational inefficiencies.

It’s also amazing just how hard it is to find an hour a week in a rapidly growing company where everyone that is capable is working and stuck answering stupid questions all day long that could be answered by a quick fix above.

“It’s an infinite loop: Don’t have the time to fix the problems because you’re stuck dealing with the problems all day.”

The fix is called “the 25th hour” – the organizations (employees, owners, managers) that find it move forward. The 4 hour workweek on the other hand – I guess if you’re a drug dealer…

Ironman Update

Work Ethic
Comments Off on Ironman Update

I’m 62 days into my work non-stop Ironman quarter. I’ve got 28 left.

I wanted to offer a bit of an update since so many of you are following and asking how it’s going. On the bright side, I’ve never been more efficient and we’ve never been more successful. Just about all the pieces of the agenda are kicking butt and when you don’t take a day off the ball you seem to find time to address even the long term problems. Being exhausted is a bit of a benefit as well because instead of being pissed off and taking it on my staff I can just say – “hey, you fucked up, can’t go back to fix it but let’s make sure we never have it happen again”. The other benefit of not having recharging time is actually being aware how much time certain things take and how often they come up – when I had weekends that reset made last week seem like ages ago. Last month? Don’t even remember that long ago. Now it’s all fresh and it’s all a few days ago or few days ahead.

Biggest benefit – no slacking and no procrastination. I’m human, I’m prone to it. I used to bump things from one week to the next – now there is no bumping, it’s all right there in front of me.

Now the bad news. I’m tired. Exhausted is actually a better description. I no longer find much joy in eating – it’s pretty much a to-do item. My sleep pattern is random (though most of that is thanks to our new son and our new puppy). I am more aware of little annoying things that I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t notice otherwise. I don’t have any energy to exercise or really do anything at all. I’ve gained about 5lb.

So there you have it – over two months of straight workdays and yeah, it’s not a fairy tale. Much like any endurance test, it hurts and it feels really stupid at times. Question I often get: Would you do it again? No, this was a one-time thing as I hand off a lot of my responsibilities and prepare the company for the years ahead – you’ve already seen the ExchangeDefender developments, the other day you saw CloudBlock, there are lots of cool things happening at Shockey Monkey – so once we cross this bridge and fill the holes in the portfolio we have now – things are pretty much going to go about 4-5x faster. I wouldn’t do it again. But knowing what I know now, would I do it all over again if I had a chance – oh hell yeah!

Oh, and I’m taking April off. Going to Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Bahamas. Gonna spend the entire month as a father, husband, drunken monkey.

Service Nemesis

IT Business, SMB
1 Comment

Every business needs a nemesis.

For example, do you know how much harder you need to work to make something mediocre look good? Now imagine taking something that’s good to great. Now imagine yourself as a perfectionist, where you are constantly motivated to squash that next little imperfection that you see out there.

Have you ever painted a room? You know how once you peel the tape there are drips, missed spots, paint under the masking tape, etc? You’re aware of all the imperfections. Nobody else looking at the same thing would see them – but you know they are there and it’s driving you crazy.

Business is not so much different than that.

Every day we work on building a better solution and making sure that it has the most meaningful impact it possibly can have in the lives of our clients. On surface, what we do at Own Web Now is not that special or that unique – we play with computers. But a few of us also know that our solutions play a small part in curing cancer, in not making Blackberry go off every few seconds during surgery, in fund raising, in financial markets and in things that are very much life and death.

So we invest everything we are into building that.

We also invest in you – even if you’re not one of our clients – we’ve likely spent some of our money on your lunch, dinner, air conditioned room, training webinar and so on. Yes, the cost of sponsoring MSPU, CharTec, ASCII, CompTIA, SMB Nation, XChange, Microsoft WPC, Microsoft Teched, msmvps.com, SBS Migration, Autotask, ConnectWise, smbbooks.com and tons of other things is immense.

We don’t do it just because it’s great marketing or just for the sales leads – we also do it because it’s the right thing to do that advances all of us as an industry.

That puts us on the edge of the marketplace where we can design the solutions that are ahead of the game of the companies much faster and richer than we are.

It arguably puts Own Web Now and ExchangeDefender in the leadership spot. We’re not the cheapest thing out there.

Own Web Now and ExchangeDefender are my self-painted walls. I see all the imperfections in them daily and wake up to fix it.

Yet… I often hear “We love you [random praise], but business is business and can you beat _____”

Business is Business

When people say Business is Business what they really are saying is all that other stuff you do really doesn’t matter, only my profit on this deal matters.

I’ve heard that a lot. I’m sure you have too.

Unfortunately, when all that matters is the price, the playing field is not equal.

There is a reason why a dinner at a fine Mexican restaurant is more expensive than Taco Bell. Yes, it might still be a taco that you’re eating, but the two are beyond comparison.

Same goes for IT services.

But let’s just look at the taco. If you can’t tell the grade of meat used in the taco, if the sauce used completely masks the relative freshness and it quenches your hunger, why should you be forced to pay $12 for a taco plate when you can buy one for $0.89 and have it served in your car?

You might even argue that eating in your car is more convenient. It’s certainly nicer to be in control of having the ability to refill your soda with the precise mix of ice and soda you like as opposed to waiting on a waiter to do it for you.

It’s all relative.

Which is why you need a nemesis.

The Nemesis

The fine dining version of Mexican food would have a hard time justifying the cost of their entrée if they had to compare their taco to a taco sold at Taco Bell to someone who didn’t have the common sense to tell the difference between the two: “Yeah, so you have a fountain – they have a bigger menu!”

Without being able to take the differentiation conversation away from the price, the nemesis argument doesn’t exist.

The nemesis argument is also far worse when you don’t control your nemesis. It’s natural to want to have people believe that you’re offering much more than someone else.

But what if the nemesis was just an option?

What if you had a choice?

That’s fantastic, you are only concerned about the price. Here are the two prices. In one corner, we have this awesome all you can eat full buffet and on this other side we have a bargain hunter menu item. Which one would you rather have?

Naturally, they want everything for the price of the bargain hunter special. But world is unfair and you have to make a decision.

Do you want to pay a premium for a premium solution, or are you only concerned about controlling your costs?

You see, the argument becomes a little bit easier to break down once we take the price out of the conversation. Because with the price, there is only one logical conclusion: the lowest bidder wins.

Justification

The way you justify the value of your solution is by explaining how all it’s components are greater in sum than the pieces that put it together. Your job is to present your solution in a way that the client would seemingly make a mistake not to pick you.

Polarity… helps.

Nearly a decade ago Dell started selling $349 servers.

These beasts were powered by Celeron processors, barely had a gig of RAM and came with a tiny single hard drive. If you tried to adjust the configuration even slightly, the price would explode.

End result: tons of people bought really high end stuff. Yes, some bought the barebones special and lived to regret it, some were even happy with it.

Without the choice, fewer people would understand the value of the higher priced solution and would not even entertain the chance of listening about it.

There are many people on both sides of the spectrum: those that only have the budget for the entry level system and those that really need something more adequate to suit their needs.

Without being able to differentiate the two, you (the seller) lose.

This in no small part was the reason we built a solution that you will be hearing about a lot. It’s a direct competitor to what OWN does, running on top of OWN’s IP.

How does it make sense?

I make money on both sides of the pole.

If they are only willing to pay for the bargain basement special, I can make a tiny margin and still have an opportunity to introduce them to my partners. If they are however interested in the premium solutions, then they can appreciate the difference in price and be more willing not just to pay it but to appreciate how much of it goes to delivering the service.

In a world where IT services are rapidly being depreciated and phased out of the marketplace, you can’t just look at the cheaper competition and dismiss it as inappropriate because nobody cares what you think – people that vote with their wallet are the only ones with an opinion that holds any value. If they want to compromise, let them. But those that understand will allow you to preserve your margins.

In business as a business, decision makers are asked to manage tradeoffs and take risks. Cheaper solution might make the sound budget decision but create a management risk of picking something that loses 150,000 accounts in a day with no Gmail phone number to call. Is the customer comfortable managing that risk? Do they even have any flexibility to check out other solutions? Is the solution just a feature point or is the solution the implementation of that feature?

Dear Vladville readers, this is the Trusted IT Advisor obituary: The age of IT arrogance is over. To be in the IT world going forward you don’t get to dictate to the clients what they need to pick, how much they need to charge – because it’s easy to find another provider. You have to embrace your nemesis, you have to elevate your value and make your clients think hard and long about whether the compromises they are about to make are truly best for their business.

Allow me to introduce you to my new kid, my nemesis: www.cloudblock.com

P.S. Value is arbitrary and relative to the observation of someone that likely can’t understand the whole scope of it anyhow. But if you can’t make money on both sides of the spectrum, and separate your premium solution from your entry level one, then for your sake I hope you’re truly exceptional. To the rest of us realistic folks out there, game on.

Off Topic 23:11

Boss, IT Business
Comments Off on Off Topic 23:11

I’m not sure what constitutes off topic for Vladville but the responses I have received today compelled me to say something I try to say as often as I can:

Thank you.

Every time I ask for something on this blog, I am hit up via email, twitter, facebook, voicemails – you name it. The reach of this blog, now 7+ years old, is immense yet it always feels like I am talking to myself when I write blog posts. Some are funny. Some are offensive. Some are constructive. Some are critical. Most are conversations I have with myself as I contemplate the best way to do something.

When I hit the wall, the amount of help I get from so many of you is overwhelming.

Thank you.

I don’t write Vladville for ads, it’s not my job (I know for a fact that my opinions at times actually hurt that) and it’s far from a mouthpiece for my commercial interests. Yet so many of you keep on finding something in common with what I’m talking about that you continue to return, continue to read and continue to talk.

For all that, I am eternally thankful.

Today, I asked for some feedback on how to better standardize the CEO followup – I often get asked to do things that are truly not my job – but my drive to serve people at times compels me to respond. All I want to do is bring some consistency to it, so when you contact me you don’t feel like I’m ignoring you if I’m on the road or the question covers something so far out of the area of my expertise that I have to ask where to get started. The fact that anyone responded, to me, is amazing. That so many of you read my rant, shared your own challenge, and offered additional options that I had not considered…… I’m speechless.

So since I have nothing to say, I’ll leave it to something that nobody ever feels comfortable arguing, Biblical verse:

Matthew 23:11 The greatest among you will be your servant.

Thanks folks, have a wonderful weekend and thanks for reaching out.

Contact Points

Boss, IT Business
5 Comments

Before I get on with my rant, I’d like to be clear that I am looking for an opinion regarding the level of contact or response the CEO of an organization can give it’s clients. At this point I’m basically a one-liner forwarding machine.

Now, the rant.

Today, I spent nearly the entire day looking for new office space. Yes, the Shockey Monkey office has been open for a little over a month. Yes, it’s already packed with people working in closets, reception and then some. My entire day consisted of looking at office spaces that are cheap but far, cheap but scary, nice but weird layout, nice but no parking, or nice with questionable ownership. I somehow managed to squeeze in a few emails and a few calls but for the most part my job at the moment consists of just making sure we’re on the right direction as we roll out our 2011 agenda.

I have always been open to partners and partners employees to the level that I don’t know any other CEO available on – even in smaller companies. It has left my mailbox as a virtual catch-all for all blown expectations and escalation requests, complaints, job requests and random inquiries.

Meanwhile, I’m only responsible for the organization and our product development.

The last time I logged into our service portal was for training.

I don’t know the names of more than half the folks that work in our support team.

So when I get an email with a support information in it, I use the following algorithm:

1. Do I know this person? No – Skip to 5.

2. Does this seem legitimate? No – Skip to 5.

3. Did they get the answer? No – Skip to 5.

4. “@#%! Someone dropped the ball on someone that knows me. How do I fix this?’”

5. Forward. “Guys, handle this.”

The Problem

I don’t want to become unavailable for my partners but resolving support request disputes, not liking the way the service is designed or implemented, frustration with any given feature – is just not my job.

Saying that out loud seems incredibly rude.

Personally, I feel that bringing that stuff to me in the first place is rude given how many contact points there are at OWN.

Also, I don’t want to become a Microsoft executive:

“That is very interesting, I was not aware of it. Thank you for your feedback. I can assure you that we will have series of meetings when I get back to Redmond and we will get to the bottom of this.”

Fast forward a few months and they’ve managed to move to a new job and you’re explaining the same issue to another Microsoftie. (with the very few exceptions of people whose careers we’ve managed to cripple in the SBSC group)

I don’t want to get to the point where I’m completely oblivious to the problems that we’re facing. Hiring an admin to deal with the BS insincerely and forward around is something I can do a poor job myself and people will catch on in a heartbeat.

I also don’t intend to respond to technical issues anymore.

Where is the middle?

Here are some options:

1. Delete the vlad@ownwebnow.com alias. Use something new for CEO level stuff, redirect vlad@ to a team.

2. Create a canned response (let me know if this seems rude):

“Thank you for contacting me regarding a technical issue you’ve experienced with our product. I want you to know that I expect our products and services to work flawlessly and that you can count on them.

Due to my busy schedule as the CEO, I don’t have immediate access to the systems to help address this directly via email. I have forwarded your email to the engineering managers and they will get back to you directly regarding this issue.”

3. Ignore email, forward to X with no response at all. Bonus, I can delegate this.

4. Setup a 900 number (for non-Americans, that’s a phone sex line where you pay a charge per minute)

5. Continue to do what I do now. Read everything and handle stuff on case by case basis.

Thoughts? Post a comment or email vlad@vladville.com