Windows Home Server: First Steps

Windows Home Server

Last night I took my first steps with the released version of Windows Home Server. Here are my initial thoughts:

  1. I should have paid $600 for the HP model, the install was excruciating and took forever.
  2. They did a heck of a job creating the installer and the deployment tools. The initial stage of the install looks like Windows Server 2008 / Vista and had all the drivers for my Intel 965 chipset so no floppy needed for a SATA controller (SiS)
  3. RTFM: Needs an 76Gb drive or better
  4. Headless or RDP? So the idea is that this server is deployed headless, but you have to activate it, but you shouldn’t log into it, but you have to install an antivirus on it because it doesn’t have one.
  5. Addins: Not very intuitive at all, comes as an installation package (.msi) but what do you do with it? RDP and install? Open on the desktop? (you actually dump into \\server\software\add-ins if you’re curious)
  6. Pushy: When I deployed the client software it wanted to run a backup within a minute. Whoa, whoa, wait a minute. I just got this new toy and you want to destroy my network and my ability to play with it first? (something can be learned from Apple here). When I told it to defer the backup it wanted to run it an hour later. It gave me no options of what I wanted to back up, so I am assuming it would have tried to squeeze everything over.
  7. Interesting documentation. I have mixed feelings about this because I tried to behave like a stupid user would. Stupid user would never be able to get the WHS online. I first let it have a go at my hardened firewall, it failed. Then I let it go at a stock WRT-54G router, which is probably the most widely used wifi device on the planet. No go again. Then I followed the documentation – they wanted 3389 redirected. Ok, not a problem – no go either. Then I decided to do what a user would have done – stuck it in a DMZ. All worked! Yay! This is where the user would likely have stopped, leaving a box on their home network wide open.
  8. Patching: Impressive. It powered itself on, patched itself without a click and told me it would be right back.
  9. Remote access: Impressive. Just… impressive.
  10. Backup tool: Impressive.

These are my initial thoughts and I went through them as a user. I have to admit that as a user I am really not interested in WHS at all,  I have a far more sinister commercial interest in WHS… WHOS to be precise (Windows Home-Office Server) but I wanted to look at this solution through the users eyes and frankly I would be a little confused because it is a little rough around the edges.. I’d probably return it to the store. It’s not an Xbox, that’s for sure, and frankly, home users are the ones with questions like “Should I be installing those Microsoft things it nags me to get (software updates)” – they wouldn’t figure this out.

However, assuming a proper setup and better OOB (out of box) experience, this is one solid puppy. It could have had a bit more of an Apple or even Xbox touch to be a killer product – for example, it follows the broken Microsoft El Generico disease they have had since friggin clippy “Learn more about Remote Access to computers” on the front page, with a stock Microsoft image. Just how many lines of code would it have taken to pluck an image from my library and make my first impression of the remote console a little bit more personal? Going to the picture library gives me the same 1996 look and feel of upload, download and search… how about preview? How about thumbnails?

Extensibility. The real appeal of the WHS solution to me is in its extensibility – this beast already has the ability to run a DHCP server, Windows SharePoint Services 3.0, and even manage home appliances and automation tasks. But, you wouldn’t know about those. Why? Well, the add-in section of the Windows Home Server site looks like a high school science fair report while the promotional site looks like a million bucks.

So to sum it up, my first impression is that this is absolutely amazing and has a ton of potential but I hope they spend money to polish it instead of spending money trying to sell it because as-is, my parents would return this to Best Buy. I am really looking forward to playing with it some more.

9 Responses to Windows Home Server: First Steps

  1. mavmesa says:

    Restores will take you about .75 Gigs per minute on a Fast Ethernet network. It doesn’t break a sweat either. Itching to try it on a Gig switch.

    And an interesting gem : It will let you “shrink” existing partitions on restore!

    This thing should be named Windows NAS Backup Platform! WNASBP! Get that “Home” word out of there!


  2. StaceyCochran says:

    Looking forward to really getting into in more.

  3. davidinark says:

    Sorry, but I do not believe “joe user” is going to want one of these. And, what is up with the Amazon back-up addin!? So, I need a backup for my backup server? Why bother with WHS at all? I know, I know, WSS, etc. If microsoft doesn’t get previews, a sleek look, and EASY to understand set-up, they can forget it. Sorry, but my parents wouldnt even come close to “fixing” the port problem. Granted, the audience is much younger, but frankly, you give it much higher marks than I would have, and that’s just from reading your write up. Unless someone can convince users why they need a “computer for their computer,” this will die faster than Microsoft Bob.

  4. vlad says:


    That was my first impression when I heard of it too. But drinking the Microsoft koolade tends to turn you because your stuff is now everywhere.

    My wife streams mp3’s from her computer to the Xbox in the living room. It is one geeky thing that she does. Pictures as well, mostly because of the HDTV.

    The box itself is not a server, its a quiet compact Shuttle PC with variable cpu fan speed set to ultra low so basically it “should” act as a central backup point of all our media instead of being on my PC or her PC or my laptop or her laptop.

    I don’t think its a consumer product either. More like edgy geek. But I will tell you this much, if they polished it a little it would go a hell of a lot further than Apple TV for example.

    P.S. The biggest selling point is the $140 license that allows for Vista imaging backups and data duplication protection. It is not meant to be a SharePoint or home office server, though thats what we’re going to make out of it. SharePoint/WSUS for the SMB’s and hosted email/terminal server/etc at OWN.

  5. davidinark says:

    Vlad, thanks for the additional info! It turns out, a local tech guy stopped by here talking about your post, and he is running MHS. We remoted in and he showed me first-hand everything it has to offer (well, after a couple of add-ins) and I have to say I am amazed! So much so, I am ready to buy one. Never have I gone from “vague idea of a bad thing” to “Holy, friggin cow!” so fast! 🙂

  6. davidinark says:

    UGH, sorry Vlad, I responded but it got flagged. What am I saying that is upsetting your filter?

  7. davidinark says:

    Well, my last two comments have been flagged…

  8. mavmesa says:


    Finished the 1 gbit ethernet restore test. Attached the WHS and the Win XP workstation and SBS to the gig switch.

    19 min to restore 27 Gig system partition. That is almost twice as fast as doing the restore at 100 Mbps.


  9. Pingback: Vlad Mazek - Vladville Blog » Blog Archive » Building the Windows Home Server

Comments are closed.