Heading to the MVP Summit (for all the wrong reasons)

Microsoft
4 Comments

mvpbadgeI do not talk about it often, but I have been given a prestigious Microsoft MVP awards twice now and everyone on that team has been just spectacular to me over the years. I got a lot of opportunities with the program that the money just can’t buy (no matter how much licensing you sell) and the MVP Summit is sort of the grand benefit of the whole program – the ability to network and deal with some of the best and brightest in this industry.

I originally danced away from going, really felt like it was better to just stay home and work on Shockey Monkey (Travis and Hank will be doing that now, you will be working with them next week if you are on the beta) how I really did not want to chance being out of town because of Katie being almost a month till giving birth.

And then today, barring anything unforseen, I will definitely be there. All thanks to AT&T. I got AT&T Tilt and Samsung BJ II. Tilt is so pathetic that aside from the device esthetics, its the usual Microsoft crapshoot unchanged since 03. Blackjack is slightly better, but still needing 20-30 tweaks to get to the working mode. And with all that, the behavior is still clunky, unreliable, error prone and so far behind Apple it’s not even funny. Forget about using this in business. Yes, it was fantastic in 04, 05, 06.. but now, not so much.

You see, my company makes a ton of money off Microsoft. We are currently mostly an infrastructure company, that is, we make money deploying, managing and scaling solutions powered by Microsoft creations.

But Microsoft 2008 is not what it was back in 1998 when we started this enterprise, it is not what it was in 2001-2003 when OWN put together ExchangeDefender, it is far from what it is now that solutions like Shockey Monkey and all our Web 2.0 projects are online.

Today, Microsoft is behind. Far, far, far behind. It seems to be losing on all fronts except the server. Even worse, it seems to be lacking any direction and is chasing the industry leaders and innovators with crippled and incomplete substitutes that are just not cutting it.

You will never lose giving your customers what they want. You will always lose trying to fight what the users are asking for, buying on their own and demanding. Users are no longer demanding Windows. Users are no longer demanding Windows Mobile. Users are no longer demanding Microsoft.

Next week, I will be at Microsoft trying to decide if Microsoft has any creative juices left, any direction to motivate me to drive my company closer to Microsoft after I come back from my paternity leave… because… and it kills me to say this because I love what Microsoft has done for us over the years.. at this point Microsoft has its eyes on Google and Yahoo, not on its base.

Exchange 2007 SP1 Limits

E12, Exchange
2 Comments

This one is for my buddy Seth who waited for months for the message limits to be lifted. For those of you interested, here is where they are changed in SP1:

Organization Configuration > Hub Transport > Global Settings > Transport Settings:

seth

Wham, bam, ticket closed.

To her majesty and her prisoners,

Awesome, Gadgets, IT Business, IT Culture
1 Comment

pedge_2970_rack_overview3 We’ve got your green right here.

As some of you have figured out already, OWN has committed to scaling out our other product lines to EU and Australia. This commitment came out of the loyalty we have received from our partners in UK and Australia and we are bringing Shockey Monkey, LiveArchive, Exchange 2007, Offsite Backups and Sharepoint over the Atlantic and Pacific, starting May 1st, 2008.

It’s not easy, being green

kermit ExchangeDefender was our first and only global infrastructure project. We learned a lot in the process and with the desire to scale out the US-based services we wanted to do something that was wildly different from our strategy in United States. We are based in Texas, where everything is bigger, including the power. <sarcasm>If there was a global capital for tolerance, it would be Texas.</sarcasm> When we sat down to draw up the new global infrastructure, we wanted to change our 80lb, 3 AMP server habit and we started testing the green stuff. Surprisingly enough, there is quite a bit in the way of components that are green and still performance conscious.

Performance was our key concern. SuperMicro, Dell and other manufacturers provide greenish, power-effective, systems but they seriously lack on the horse power or space. But if you look a little harder, there are devices that are both sizeable and capable of performing well under the load.

wdfDesktop_GP_CS For example, Western Digital manufactures a SATA2 3 GB/s drive, 1 Tb in size, that consumes 40% less power. Because it draws less power, it heats the chasis less (less cooling needed in the HD slots) and is overall more cost efficient. It spins at 5,400 RPM which is your average laptop drive, but under load speeds up to 7,200 RPM which is average for the desktop. For low intensity storage, low priority inserts, etc, we were able to adjust some of our own (read: poorly written) code to work on it quite well.

pedge_r200_overview1

For their part, Dell also has a low power high performance solution in PowerEdge R200 for smaller nodes. It also has the PowerEdge 2900 III Energy Smart, about 2x the price of the regular model. For their part, SuperMicro brings forward a 1U server with a 260W power supply drawing less than 0.4 AMP at full blast. (if you don’t know me, this would be a great place to stop reading this post)

Texan by the grace of god..

So there you go, Own Web Now Corp has gone green. We felt that as guests in these nations we should start to be more respectful.

As for our beautiful home, crank that Dell: “Malaysian by birth, Texan by the grace of god”; We will continue to rack servers that weight more and consumer more power than a teenage girl because nobody wants to see that buffering text while waiting on pr0n to load. As vulgar as that may seem, it’s the truth, people pay for performance and convenience – and the market isn’t ready for the green.

Disaffected Feedback

Microsoft
4 Comments

Blogging helps open up the company and its employees thoughts on the world around them, but sometimes the insight can hurt too. Take a look at this from Steve Clayton:

Peace. Why people spend so much time trying to find out what’s coming next is beyond me. Okay so people like to get the scoop but really does anyone care *that* much about a product that is quite a way off? I have access to a tonne of information inside Microsoft using our corporate intranet search but how many times have a I searched for details on Windows 7? Precisely zero. I just have better things to do. Doesn’t everyone else?

Let’s see… Popular opinion of Microsoft Vista is that it blows. Popular opinion of Microsoft Windows Server 2008 is that.. oh wait, there isn’t one, because most people don’t even know it’s out. Office 2007 and it’s completely changed interface.. But what the heck do I know, I just sell this for a living and as of late we are selling more and more Blackberry and Apple.

At the time when Microsoft can’t put together an advertising and promotion strategy to save its life, is it a wise thing to try to downplay something that the consumers are actually EXCITED about? WHY do you think people are looking for what is AFTER VISTA? Why do you think they are DOWNGRADING to XP?

Note to Microsoft: Consumers are not excited about your products. Businesses are not excited about your products. The ONLY thing you have going on right now is inertia and Xbox, have you heard of advertising? Television perhaps, maybe between the billion Apple ads telling everyone that Vista blows?

Come on people!

Fast Table Repairs for myisam

Linux
2 Comments

SQL table corruption can happen from time to time for a number of reasons. As we have scaled ExchangeDefender, I ran into a number of situations in which the data inserts were incomplete, or some maintenance tasks (large delete queries) crashed the table. This in turn would affect processes that produced reports and BI based on that data and really create a ton of pain and complaints.

So how does one repair crashed myisam tables?

myisamchk -r /var/lib/mysql/database/table.MYI

This process rebuilds the indexes and the entire table, but is very reactive in nature, you have to be aware of the crashed table in order to repair it.

There is a more maintenance-conscious process called mysqlcheck:

mysqlcheck –auto-repair -A -u dbuser -p database

This is a very thorough (read: slow as @#%@) process that will check all your tables and at the end of it proceed with the repair. Fantastic. Unless you have thousands and thousands of tables that you want to check quickly. This process on our dev box took a day and a half to run. Here is one that executes in less than 10 minutes in just a few lines of php:

$myquery = mysql_query(“show keys from $table”);
if(mysql_error() != “”) { backup / repair / report / log }

Stick that into a loop that goes through all your tables and you’re set.

Poor Corporate Hiring Strategies in SMB

IT Business, IT Culture
6 Comments

I knew there would come a day when I would have to categorically disagree with Karl on virtually every piece of advice he has offered. Take a look at this post on Hiring the Best Employee.

The basic flaw in Karl’s process, and process of hiring in virtually every corporate institution, is that the focus is on finding the right fit for the role, not the right individual for the company. Have you ever heard the following words:

You are just not a good fit.

Yeah, you’re just a fantastic person, very talented, exactly what we are looking for except you didn’t fit the role of the imaginary employee we came up with while circling the lines of the resume of the last two people that didn’t leave this company in a quadruple-fatality shootout.

Criteria hiring works OK in very large companies both because HR department has limited time/money and the employees are not really meant to be very fluid in their capacities. They post a list of qualifications, people with time to rearrange their resume send in their applications, the most apt liars that can repeat them back to HR meet the hiring manager who is really looking for someone that can read and think at the same time. This is an awesome way to hire a burger assembler at McDonalds or a data entry person in a hospitality industry.

It is a horrible way to hire in SMB, and the reason why most one man shops that do hire someone end up firing them on a very short schedule. How is it that someone that fit every one of your criteria, that you really liked, that could do everything that was expected turned out so horribly – as a matter of fact, most turn out so horribly bad that many one man shops never want to hire another person again or be someone’s manager?

Flexible Prospect, Desperate Candidate, Fired Employee

The traditional hiring process falls apart at the mere premise that there are people out there so unfulfilled with their jobs that they have the time to spend on full-day interviews, three lunches and two application appointments. Unless you are offering a LOT of money, or seeking an executive with commensurate pay, you are statistically less likely to find a good candidate and more likely to just find someone that is unemployed for a number of very good reasons.

Think about the desperation for a second. If you are finding a candidate that is willing to put up with such a huge hassle not to work for a brand name company with global visibility (IBM, Google, Microsoft) after which they can go to another big company and claim global experience, how desperate are they for employment now?

Desperation brings out the worst in people. They will lie. They will tailor the right resume. They will subject to every test, interview, assessment and application you give them.

Then as soon as something better, something they really wanted, becomes available they will leave you.

What went wrong? You hired the wrong person. Right role, right fit,  wrong person.

The truth about SMB is that we look for flexible people, ambitious and knowledgeable, that want to work well with other people. But at the same time we want to subject them to baselining, assessments, comparative metrics and treat them as business assets that will constantly learn and evolve just not to the point that they figure out that they can make more money elsewhere for far less work. This is the underlying theory of “Human Resources” — treating people like movable objects, hiring them based on a list of credentials, bullet points, and percentage based compatibility with the set of criteria in the Kit with folders Step 1, Step 2, Step 3.

Then the business owner sits back in dismay when the employee leaves under the most unpleasant of circumstances… seriously, should you ever expect any better?

The Right Hiring Process

Hire people. Not roles.

If you hire the right person, they will find a way to fit the role you give them now. They will be able to adjust as your business adjusts. They will be capable of being promoted, of teaching, managing, nurturing and growing other employees that your company gets as it grows.

If you hire the right role, that employee will be gone with the first sudden shift in your business strategy (read Erick’s book on Managed Services) and you will be stuck at square one of looking for a fit for a hole that will change shape with a business that must change in order to grow and survive.

You can either adjust your business hiring practices to fit your changing business and the rapidly changing IT market… or you can franchise a Subway hole in a wall sandwich shop.

The process of finding, qualifying, and hiring people is NOT bullet point or KIT based. It can’t be downloaded online, it can’t be ran through a computer, it is not something you can process. If you want to see how well the process-based hiring works, go to Target. Look at all the drones there. Not an ounce of passion. Not a cent of personality. Just drones running around doing what the master told them.

But you don’t want that. You want an adaptable, flexible, skilled, creative passionate employee that is going to have your best interest at heart and do as they are told (hopefully for less than market value). Good luck with that.

The process of hiring, qualifying, nurturing, leading, empowering, enabling and growing a creative sales force that can work in a rapidly changing business is at a core of business leadership and being able to work with people and treat them like people.

We look for good people. There is always plenty of business to go around and plenty of things to get people to work on. There is not always a ready supply of people that are motivated, willing and capable of working on what we have. But we also aren’t installing a revolving door in our office.

Hire the right person. Get them to build up your company in the same way you have built it to the point of being able to allocate a salary.

Only then do you get someone who has your company on their mind, not just themselves. 

Cultural expectations of toll free numbers

IT Business, Vladville
10 Comments

One of the fun parts of running a global business is trying to adjust to the different cultural and business expectations of different countries. If you’ve ever worked with the people from the far east you know what I mean, but sometimes even the most inconsequential items tend to make a difference.

In United States, companies are expected to offer toll free numbers, for everything. Unless you want to be bundled into the “I work from my spare bathroom” and “Ask me about making $2K a week from home painted on the back window of my car” types of companies, you spend the extra $8 a month and get a toll free number. It is more than a business identity that separates real companies from scammers on prepaid cell phones, it is an expectation set long ago that customers contacting the company for service should not do so at their own expense. It’s a matter of courtesy, an invitation if you will. Don’t think about the long distance charges, just call us, we’ll foot the bill. Yes, we’ll eat all 6 cents of it to earn hundreds of dollars in business. It’s just good business.

Brits don’t see it quite that way. Totally opposite, actually. Earlier today I was setting up the UK trunks for Shockey Monkey support and the UK telco offered me 0800, 0845 along with every city code in UK. Naturally confused I called one of my partners, James Cash, and asked about the dialing options (and opinions). Apparently, unlike in US, UK companies tend not put a lot of emphasis on toll free use:

0870 is quite expensive to call and should be avoided, 0800 is free to call, 0845 is local rate. I’m pretty sure that 0870 and 0845 are being phased out and replaced by 0844 numbers

Thinking that James may be messing with me I decided to ring up the telco. They said the very same: “Unless you are purely interested in making a sale, 0800 numbers are very few and far in between.

Talk about the opposite world on something so little. What generally indicates a shady operation in USA is the norm in UK where the toll free numbers likely indicate you’re about to be harassed by a slimy sales person.

Pleasing them all… I am not sure where courtesy stops and ridiculing begins but I am all of a sudden more self-conscious about my choice of phone numbers.

You learn something new every day. Not necessarily useful…

The Loudmouth Kick In The AdSense

Vladville
2 Comments

In what is surely to be the most hotly disputed or buried story of 2008, recent study finds that “influencers” happen to have very little actual influence over their audience. Why, I’d never…  You mean to tell me that the worthless people who could only get an English major, the same ones that couldn’t get a real press job and spend their day bashing mainstream media aren’t.. influential? Say it ain’t so man, where is this world going to get true leadership if its not delivered by the guys with 10,000 Twitter buddies reflecting on their stool consistency?

How about the people that are actually doing something? Nah, thats just ridiculous.

Here is the thing, actual creators, movers and shakers tend to either not be very good at communicating or too swamped with what they are actually doing. Reporters, by comparison, are only useful to the extent that they can quickly inform you about whats going on.

So what happens when the reporters try to run the show? What happens when the charlatans try to pretend they matter and build a fantasy world of grandiose self-congratulations? Debates such as “Where has the original thought gone?” start, but all the relevant people have long walked out the door and well, delusion sets in.

Just because you get a lot of traffic, does not make you relevant. Just because you are relevant, does not mean you are influential.

That is something that upsets me the most about blogging, the number of times I have heard that there is no reason to blog just because Susan Bradley says it all already, or because its going to be covered by Engadget or seen on TechMeMe. So what? Blogging is about opinions, about conversations, about presenting an idea.

Do you have an idea? Well, lay it out. People will think about it, come back, and hopefully you will be enriched by what your visitors have to say.

It is also an amazing way to market yourself. I listen to woe is me stories every day about the sales phone not ringing, about customers not banging down the doors, about how things actually require hard work. What did you expect it to be like? An infomercial? You just open up shop, pick a logo, and people slam down your web site and just line up to buy and click and pay attention to you?

There is an incoming wave of reality about to wash out a lot of AdSense accounts fronted by plaguerised me-too “news” you can get everywhere and anywhere else. Find a way to stand out, or its the end of filling up your coffers with the theoretical money (see South Park)

Most of all, find something to say. If there is nothing to you, why should anyone trust you or do business with you?

Excellent breakdown of the numbers and take on the Tipping Point here.

What is different? (24 hours, 3 iPods)

Shockey Monkey
48 Comments

As I mentioned yesterday, if there was ever an easy way for you to score an iPod, this is it. Below you will find three pictures. What is different about them?

 

 

I need to know specifically what difference you see.

Post a comment, three winners will be randomly chosen from the comments that get it right. I’m not looking for the numbers, so this has a medium degree of difficulty.

But hey, free iPod, and an advanced copy of SBS Show #28. Can’t beat that. 

If your opinion is worth $10 you should be standing on the corner begging for money

IT Business
3 Comments

There is pretty much only one thing that Schrag and I agree on, and it’s that IT survey conclusions are worthless because they draw data from unemployed people. Look at the email I just got:

Subject: First 100 survey respondents receive a $10 gift certificate

If you would like to influence the way technology vendors support channel partners serving the government market, please take a few minutes to complete this brief survey.
Everything Channel’s Institute for Partner Education and Development (IPED), the professional services division of the Everything Channel (publishers of CRN & VARBusiness) is conducting an important research project to better understand the requirements of solution providers in the government marketplace to help influence the direction of the partner programs.
Click your personal URL below to complete the survey:

Ok, let’s review: this organization makes money selling conclusions they draw from rapid-fire unemployed IT people that are racing through a survey to make sure they get their $10 as one of the first 100. What sort of legitimate goal can this survey produce with that kind of bait?

I hope the survey’s goal is to figure out how people fail at IT business so horribly that they have the time to enter surveys in the middle of the day for $10.

Maybe IPED is trying to figure out which marketing strategies are failing?

Which markets do you target, with your unemployed ass, so we can tell our readers that those markets are not investing in IT?

I’m familiar with IPED and have met and talked to enough people on their side that I know they are not fools.. but with the incentives like the one above I hope IPED is producing a report: “Fu..ed in IT: Top 100 ways to assure your doom.”

Otherwise, IPED does not have an ounce of credibility to hang on to.